0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
%
The Russia-Ukraine War has once again demonstrated that energy security is a multidimensional and interdisciplinary concept. Energy security is now being evaluated not only in terms of physical infrastructure and supply continuity but also in relation to dimensions such as cybersecurity, financial stability, environmental sustainability, and societal resilience.
Particularly, the cybersecurity of energy infrastructures has gained even more importance with the war. The increase in cyber attacks targeting critical energy infrastructures has demonstrated that the digital dimension of energy security is also of strategic importance. This situation reveals that the concept of energy security needs to be continuously redefined in line with technological developments and new threat vectors.
Additionally, the societal dimension of energy security has also become more prominent with the war. The societal impacts of rising energy prices, the risk of energy poverty, and the social costs of energy transition constitute the sociopolitical dimensions of energy security. This situation demonstrates that energy security policies should be evaluated not only from technical and economic perspectives but also from the perspective of social justice and equality.
The impacts of the Russia-Ukraine War on global energy security will be long-term, even if the war itself ends. This conflict has constituted a turning point in the evolution of the energy security concept. Energy security is now perceived as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary, and dynamic concept.
Within the framework of this new paradigm, the success of energy security policies will depend on the extent to which parameters such as geopolitical sensitivity, strategic foresight, environmental responsibility, and social justice are integrated, beyond technical and economic factors. Simultaneously, ensuring energy security will be possible not only at the national level but also through the strengthening of regional and global cooperation mechanisms.
In conclusion, the energy crisis created by the Russia-Ukraine War will go down in history as a fundamental reference point shaping the energy geopolitics of the 21st century. This crisis has demonstrated that energy security should be addressed with a holistic approach encompassing not only economic and technical issues but also elements such as national security, geopolitics, environmental sustainability, and societal resilience. In this context, the energy security paradigm of the future will be shaped as a multidimensional structure based on the principles of diversification, resilience, sustainability, and justice.
